Allison’s Anecdotes

May 21st, 2008

Clarity on Censorship

Posted by Allison in Uncategorized



Wow… I really said a lot today… sorry guys!  I feel the need now to clarify some things I said (or didn’t say) in class in reference to censorship.

I appreciated Pearl’s comment as it made us realize that this isn’t a one-size-fits-all-rule.  As with all the issues presented in class, there are multiple ways of looking at the situation.  And it is from this multi-faceted standpoint that I make the case that censorship is something that doesn’t belong in public schools in reference to textbooks, literature, or the like.  Now, 3 weeks ago, I know that my views would be totally different and I would have agreed whole-heartedly that parents/government should censor the material brought into the classroom.  However, my views are different now.  In order to maintain a degree of social justice, educating our children to think critically, and challenge the status quo, one must be willing to consider varying ideas and different view points.  Literature is an amazing medium by which we are able to investigate, educate, and discover new opportunities.  I didn’t read Harry Potter until last December — I originally took the viewpoint of most conservatives.  Now, I love it.  Censorship though isn’t about one book — it’s an ideology.  It’s an ideology that stems from the desire to control what is deemed acceptable by society.  How can we as educators embrace an ideology that exists to control when we rally for social justice and equality? 

Speaking in reference to parents — parents are the primary teacher of the child.  A teacher must forge a positive partnership with the parents throughout the entire year.  A teacher should take the parent’s perspective into consideration and seek to embrace the culture and collaborate for the good of the child.  However, if a teacher is going to provide an equal educational experience for all students, then the teacher must present varied topics and opinions.  There is not one right way for every child.  Because multiple ways of learning exist, I think the teacher should structure the classroom in a way that is age-appropriate, of course, but poses questions to children allowing them to see different viewpoints and ideas and discover their own beliefs.  Parents should absolutely dialogue with their children and ascertain their thoughts and feelings.  A parent should be able to help the child weed through the multiple options and assist the child in formulating his own beliefs.  With parent’s guiding the development of the child, and teachers facilitating exposure and offering challenges, a child will gain the best from both perspectives and be able to make informed, critical decisions as an adult.

It truly takes many voices, experiences, and perspectives to provide a child with an effective education.  I hope that an open environment, where questions are welcomed and opinions are raised, will characterize my classroom. 

Create a free edublog to get your own comment avatar (and more!)

2 Responses to ' Clarity on Censorship '

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to ' Clarity on Censorship '.

  1.    Sylvia said,

    on May 22nd, 2008 at 5:26 am

    I totally agree with age-appropriate presentation of different viewpoints. How else can we foster critical thinking in our students? I think that you’re right – we cannot stymie our students’ intellectual development through censorship literature in textbooks or libraries. I believe it’s an awesome responsibility to present alternative perspectives to our students in ways that are age and developmentally appropriate and allow their parents to be involved.

  2.    cmorris0620 said,

    on May 23rd, 2008 at 8:26 am

    I agree that parents are the primary teacher of a child, so we should not worry about censoring certain books. I think if the parents and teachers are doing what needs to be done, the students will be okay.

Leave a reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image